The world of cryptocurrencies/tokens has somewhat mimicked the real world economics, which is nothing unusual, after all humans as creatures of habit are the ones controlling it.
There is absolutely nothing wrong with going about business in ways and mannerisms that are known, understood and that consumers feel comfortable with. However, this brings us back to the start. Progress is not dependent upon ‘comfort zones’, it is in fact dependent upon changes that are founded upon the ‘unknown’.
The limitations put upon the practical use of ‘tokens’ (data on blockchains) is determined by humans. Even though theoretically it is ‘unlimited’ in possibilities that are dependent on data storage, the limitations come about due to the restrictions determined by the users of this data.
Hence, the limitations are dependent on us and the technology being used.
Basically defining the future use cases of blockchain technology and the data ledgered on them.
Due to blockchains having the capability of being ‘decentralized’ in storage of data, the possibilities to exit outside of what is ‘known’ can be dwelled into and made possible and eventually a reality.
This does not have to resemble any use cases to date, it all depends on the visions of those who are prepared to go beyond the limits of the known.
FULLALT proposes the notion that there is no need for any one particular token to be the core of any transactions, nor the need for any one blockchain as such. Diversity is the one and only means on ensuring decentralization.
Communications between all these various blockchains and the abilities to utilize all the data on them shall be a major contributor to all the possibilities that the blockchains and data on them offer.
Usage of this data shall determine the importance and value of the data.
Instead of limiting the use cases to what is defined with classic ‘tokenization’ models, there are no limits to usage of blockchains once we do not limit ourselves to the classic monetary models.
There are no reasons why blockchains should be limited by ‘tokenization’.
This concept is for starters the idea that can seriously open up some new visions as to what all is possible.
Shall there be “tokens” issued?
Only by those endeavours that require tokenization, those endeavours that do not need tokenization shall not be tokenized. Apart from it being a total waste of capacities, it doesn’t differ from all the behaviour we have too often seen to date. Thinking out of the box.
How can we go forwards without “tokens”?
How did any of the endeavours through the course of history move forwards?
Synergy and determination!
Synergising the capacities that we have available, without limiting ourselves to the ‘classic’ models of management and ideas.
Complexity needs to be avoided if possible, as complexity brings about bureaucracy, which brings about corruption and inevitable disruption.
However, if in the event for the purposes of adding value to certain segments of this endeavour in future tokens are issued, they shall exclusively be defined as such and applicable only for the branch of business it is being issued for.